Would you marry a woman who earns more

You know how women have a fear of being under the rule/jurisdiction/control of a tyrannical man - that is to say - one who wields power irresponsibly and impulsively without good judgement?

Yes, this is why you as a man should not want to be under a woman's authority.It is functionally the same thing.Irresponsible and egregious misuse of power.

We see this everywhere - from female managers in the workplace, to female teachers in schools - almost every young man can tell you a story of how a woman with institutional authority punished him in an unjust manner.

Why would you want to replicate this romantically?

Dumb!

Women literally don't want to get stuck with the very type of man who would behave like them if they wielded power.Literally, a woman's worst nightmare of a tyrannical man is just her if she had all the power.

Pretty funny, don't you think?

How many do you think realise this?

And professional leadership is easier than private leadership, because the personal requires mastery over emotion (to act justly in spite of tension) whilst the professional lets you bypass it. You don't need soul to be a good manager. You do need soul to be a good father/husband

Leading well when you're under emotional influence is 10x harder than leading well because you turned your emotions off to be a logic bot

No woman can lead well with emotions on, and romance requires emotions, ergo not even high functioning career women can lead marriages justly

This is also to say nothing of polarity. Women who spend their days being paid to be responsible for other people's emotions get psychically drained by it. You think they want to come home to a man who does the same thing? No. They want to collapse into him away from their burden

So yes, men actually fear the very same thing that women fear:

Being under the rule of a tyrant who abuses their power.It's just with men, you actually have a shot at getting one who won't do that.We as men know unilaterally that a woman who wouldn't do that doesn't exist.

Challenge: act justly and fairly with full emotional consideration and compassion for the person under your charge - do not be selfish - do not be erratic - think clearly with restraint and proportionately without turning off your feelings

Hard for most men, impossible for women

For what it's worth, you should know this is coming from someone who naturally gravitates towards logic and reason in analysis. I'm not speaking from my natural predisposition or preference here. I'm speaking from wisdom and experience. In crude terms: I'm not some gay hippie.

So in essence my contention is most women can't turn off their emotions, but some can. And of the ones who can, they can make good professional decisions, *BUT* family life necessitates making good decisions WITHOUT turning off emotions, and so they're unsuited to this because they'll either be hysterically unjust or a compassionless bot. No golden mean.

And this isn't a judgement against women either, because I think most men are not very good at this either. It's just that, if anyone is going to be good at it - it will be a man. This is my point. It probably has a minimum IQ and testosterone level requirement.